| Reference code: | NDE-149 |
| Location: | BF-GMS
|
Title:
| The effectiveness and user preferences of two tactile breathing devices in reducing stress in stressed individuals: A mixed methods study
|
| Publication year: | 2025
|
URL:
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100603
|
| Abstract/Results: | ABSTRACT:
Background
Rising stress levels have led to increased interest in stress management tools, particularly tactile breathing devices. Despite their popularity, there is limited evidence on their physiological and psychological effectiveness and user perceptions. This study evaluates the effectiveness of and preferences toward two tactile breathing devices among highly stressed individuals.
Methods
The study involved 36 participants using two breathing devices, moonbird and Core. Physiological data were collected using EEG, ECG, and a breathing belt. User preferences and self-reported experiences were assessed via questionnaires.
Results
Moonbird usage was associated with increased delta power and decreased alpha power, while Core did not significantly modify EEG power. ECG analysis indicated no significant differences in mean heart rate between devices. Both devices reduced heart rate variability during use, but no lasting effects were observed post-intervention. Respiratory rates decreased during both devices’ use, with moonbird showing more sustained effects post-intervention. There were no significant differences in self-reported relaxation and energy levels between the devices, though moonbird was preferred overall for its handling and breathing guidance.
Conclusion
Both devices demonstrated the ability to lower physiological stress, as indicated by improvements in certain neurophysiological measures during use, with moonbird preferred for its ergonomic design and tactile feedback. These findings underscore the importance of user experience in device effectiveness, highlighting the need for a user-centric approach in device design. Future research should explore long-term effectiveness, real-world user feedback, and the physiological and psychological mechanisms associated with these devices.
|
| Accessibility: | Document exists in file
|
Language:
| eng
|
Author:
| Honinx, E.
|
Secondary author(s):
| Meys, M., Broes, S., Van Langenhoven, L., Janssens, R., Huys, I., Oswald, V., Annen, J., Laureys, S., Martial, C., Gosseries, O.
|
Document type:
| Article
|
Number of reproductions:
| 3
|
Reference:
| Honinx, E., Meys, M., Broes, S., Van Langenhoven, L., Janssens, R., Huys, I., Oswald, V., Annen, J., Laureys, S., Martial, C., & Gosseries, O. (2025). The effectiveness and user preferences of two tactile breathing devices in reducing stress in stressed individuals: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 25(3), Article 100603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100603
|
| 2-year Impact Factor: | 4.4|2024
|
| Impact factor notes: | Impact factor not available yet for 2025
|
| Times cited: | 0|2025-09-27
|
| Indexed document: | Yes
|
| Quartile: | Q1
|
| Keywords: | Stress management / Breathing devices / User preferences / Physiological measures / EEG / ECG / Respiration
|
The effectiveness and user preferences of two tactile breathing devices in reducing stress in stressed individuals: A mixed methods study |