Reference code: | PT/FB/BL-2014-380.02 |
Location: | BF-GMS
|
Title:
| Supernatural belief is not modulated by intuitive thinking style or cognitive inhibition
|
Publication year: | 2017
|
URL:
| http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-14090-9
|
Abstract/Results: | ABSTRACT:
According to the Intuitive Belief Hypothesis, supernatural belief relies heavily on intuitive thinking—and decreases when analytic thinking is engaged. After pointing out various limitations in prior attempts to support this Intuitive Belief Hypothesis, we tested it across three new studies using a variety of paradigms, ranging from a pilgrimage field study to a neurostimulation experiment. In all three studies, we found no relationship between intuitive or analytical thinking and supernatural belief. We conclude that it is premature to explain belief in gods as ‘intuitive’, and that other factors, such as socio-cultural upbringing, are likely to play a greater role in the emergence and maintenance of supernatural belief than cognitive style.
|
Accessibility: | Document exists in file
|
Copyright/Reproduction:
| By permission
|
Language:
| eng
|
Related objects:
| BL-2006-062.07
|
Author: | Farias, M.
|
Secondary author(s):
| van Mulukom, V., Kahane, G., Kreplin, U., Joyce, A., Oviedo, L., Hernu, M., Rokita, K., Savulescu, J., Möttönen, R.
|
Document type:
| Article
|
Number of reproductions:
| 3
|
Percentiles:
| 6
|
Reference:
| Farias, M., van Mulukom, V., Kahane, G., Kreplin, U., Joyce, A., ..., Möttönen, R. (2017). Supernatural belief is not modulated by intuitive thinking style or cognitive inhibition. Scientific Reports, 7, Article number: 15100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14090-9
|
2-year Impact Factor: | 4.122|2017
|
Times cited: | 21|2024-02-08
|
Indexed document: | Yes
|
Quartile: | Q1
|
Keywords: | Paranormal beliefs / Dual processing / Cognitive inhibition / Intuitive thinking
|
|